I explained why I think you are wrong. The irony is that you insist that I am wrong without actually having read my argument.

Anyway it doesn't matter. Those who want to have an alternative and more nuanced view on the matter can read what I wrote.

The irony here is that your whole story is about how people must listen to you, but you are not actually interested in any exchange of ideas. You just want people to take a lecture from you without objection.

That is just bad teaching. Imagine a teacher who did not accept any questions or critical remarks by students?