So when asked about proof for your initial claims. You respond by asserting even more unsubstantiated claims. I think you misunderstood a bit the point about proof.

When I ask for proof, it is not an invitation for you to continue rambling on about your other conspiratorial pet theories.

And unlike you I can actually backup my claims: Here is a story with various footage of BLM members trying to stop looters: https://www.insider.com/white-protesters-deface-and-destroy-property-endangering-black-protesters-2020-6

Does this mean no BLM member did looting? Or that everyone tried to stop it? Of course not. Unlike you I am not making sweeping claims. I am merely claiming this was something happening.

My claims are akin to "black sheeps exist" while yours are akin to "all sheep are black" which is a much stronger claim which requires substantial proof.